Flash gun comparison

Discussion in 'Photography' started by sandman, Jul 7, 2010.

  1. sandman

    sandman TinpotCombe

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    16,787
    Likes Received:
    0
    Supports:
    .
    Just bought myself a flash gun today, thought i'd post up a couple of pictures to display the difference between the built in flash and a flash gun.

    Built in flash
    [​IMG]

    Flash gun
    [​IMG]

    The flash gun gives much more accurate colour representation whilst the built in flash tends to wash out the colour.

    This is because the built in flash is directed at the object your taking a photograph of where as the flash gun you can aim to bounce the light off of the ceiling or walls in order to light up the whole scene from above rather than face on, it also reduces shadows because of this.


    Taking pictures of a person would show more obvious result than my example as skin tone is usually badly effected by built in flashes.
    I got this one
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Electronic-...1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1278530703&sr=8-1


    Just thought i'd share in case anyone else was considering getting one, or wanted to know more about them.:thumb
     
    #1 sandman, Jul 7, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 7, 2010
  2. CobblerJay

    CobblerJay Registered User

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    10,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Supports:
    Northampton Town F C
    I did consider getting one when I bought my camera as it was on offer but only would have saved me £10 or so.

    I might consider getting one one day soon.
     
  3. sandman

    sandman TinpotCombe

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    16,787
    Likes Received:
    0
    Supports:
    .
    I'd just get used to your camera first and work out if you tend to be in lots of circumstances that require it. Otherwise you may well end up with lots of expensive equipment you might not use:thumb

    When i got my camera i didn't even understand the point of a speed gun.
     
  4. The Fuzz

    The Fuzz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    17,739
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    Supports:
    Manchester United
    I rarely use the flash as is. Pictures come out quite rubbish with the one blob of white in the middle.
     
  5. The Fuzz

    The Fuzz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    17,739
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    Supports:
    Manchester United
    Also Fosters ? :no:
     
  6. OptimusPrime

    OptimusPrime Cottaging

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,145
    Likes Received:
    6
    Supports:
    Fulham
    I'm definitely going to invest in one soon, it's essential for doing live music photography which is something I'm taking up soon.
     
  7. sandman

    sandman TinpotCombe

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    16,787
    Likes Received:
    0
    Supports:
    .
    Yeah i never used the built in flash as it produces crap results. I'd slow the shutter speed down, whack the ISO up as high as i could and put the aperture as high or low (not sure which way round it is but as close to 0 as possible). Doesn't always work though, and you can end up with a lot of noise in the picture :(

    If it's in the fridge then it's good no matter what it is:smokin:


    Yeah a flash is pretty essential for that as you need to keep a decent shutter speed.
     
  8. Sacko

    Sacko Tigers Tigers Rah Rah Rah

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Supports:
    Hull City
    Seems to work a treat. Not badly priced either...
     

Share This Page