Scotland supporters keep telling me that they could surprise people in WC2002 but they only beat San Marino 2-0. In my view their shit. England reserves.
We're shit. But England reserves???!!! We are not that bad. Here's an example of the logic you use: OMG England only beat Luxembourg 3-0. They must be shit too. *cough* Anyway, who are these people who are saying we might do well in the WC?
Aye who are these phantom pholk that say we'll do well in 2002? Of course we wont - we'll struggle even to qualify, what with Croatia AND Belgium in our group. And whats all this about England reserves? Sorry for being 1/10th of your size man!
Some folk in Dundee said that they were not to be underestimated and watch them in 2002. Secondly you are the reserves for england. Sullivan, Elliott, Hutchison(Geordie), Johnson are all English but know they cant get in our first team so they go for a second rate team - Scotland!. P.S- If you think that england is ten times the size of england then you need to go back to school.
Listen mong, England has 50 million people, Scotland 5 million. If you consider the area of a country to be important then why aren't Russia, Canada, USA and China world beaters? Sullivan and Elliott, if English, would be in your squad if not first team. *cough*
And remind me which team Elliott plays for, and if that team is above or below Spurs, Villa, and Leeds ... Campbell is good but over-rated. Southgate is average. Ferdinand is a complete laugh. Elliott is in the Tony Adams mould, with a flair for goal-scoring.
I stand corrected. You had a population of 5.1 million in 1996. And interestingly enough your population was 1.8 million in 1811, and had a steady increase of around 1.2million every 50 years until 1961, when it hit a drop due to so many cheap bastards avoiding the poll tax!
First of all - who is this Johnson geezer? your talking about David Johnson? I think you'll find he is not a Scotland International in any way shape or form. Secondly - as Gio and Joao said, our population is 5.1 million, your population is 50 million...i make that 10.2% of your population....also may I just remind you about John Barnes? Anyhow, i dont know what your argument here is exactly - we say we're crap, you say we're crap...errmm...
Of course england reserves would beat you - just look at the tallent we have to offer. GK- Martyn, Seaman, James, Wright, Weaver,Robinson, Kirkland, P Gerrard, Flowers, Harper RB- neville (both), watson, barton, brown, Rowett, Carragher CB- Campbell, Barry, Woodgate, Ferdinand, Keown, Southgate, Ehiogu, Richards, Rufus LB- Clapham, A Wright, Le Saux, Harley, Ash Cole, Thatcher, gay er gray RM- Beckham, Mcmanaman, Anderton, Parlour, Taylor, Bowyer DCM- Gerrard, Butt, Ince, Wise, Batty, Lampard, Sherwood ACM- Scholes, Dyer, Cole, Carrick, Merson, Redknapp, Murphy, Barmby LM, Wilcox, S Johnson, Hendrie, S Hughes FRS- Heskey, Owen, Fowler, Smith, Andy Cole, Phillips(actually no he is shit), Jeffers, Stewart, Beatie, Dublin, Christie,K Campbell, Sheringham, Cort
em, yes, we all know England has far better resources than us - we are not doubting that - but, em, funny how even your first team managed to lose to us the last time we played each other... and yes yes I know we lost on aggregate and all that but what I mean is - it doesnt matter if you have 50 players better than us, cos you can only play 11 v. 11, and when you do you only JUST manage to scrape through anyway!
LM, Wilcox, S Johnson, Hendrie, S Hughes LOL!!!! BTW England's reserves player for player would be a better team than Scotland, but your forgetting that Scotland actually have a good manager wheras England have always been managed by morons.
