24 Mafia

I think Sme only posed the question though to gauge the opinion of the group.

Worth noting Sme's at least laid a vote, unlike some of the others unhappy with Sme's comment about a no lynch.

 

Fair point.

 

Agree

Agree with both of these too

I think SME was genuine in his intentions, though. I suspect we’ll head towards a no lunch and i’m okay with that. Doesn’t mean we can’t look at players in the meantime

 

I think there’s scum between Hashtag and Zydus

VOTE ZYDUS

 

RD gets points for getting this in early, but think it is a relatively flimsy point and wording that could also easily be from a scum perspective

If he wasn’t the first to have cast doubt on it I’d be scum leaning, but I’m null

 

I think this is very interesting but town players ought to be hunting for mafia whatever way is possible and never giving a free pass, lynch or no lynch is surely only a byproduct of the hunt?

Last game nobody had a clue who was who by the end of day 1 and the one before people had some suspects created by people reacting to pressure.

I don't know that it matters how many or few players there are as we don't know right now how many killers there will be or how the game will work as "24" theme, we know that day 1 the lynch threat applies pressure

 

Right I’m done with this day phase

vote lugna

 

This is a much better post. I think your wording for the earlier post seemed as if you were trying to slyly forward no lynch.

 

After a quick read back of the 3 pages so far I can see some people looking for stuff and some sitting back.

I'm fairly happy with scunny, josh, Burg and Jason trying to interact and start conversations and see what would happen with votes.

I have found hash's vote an interesting push on sme and its created a few things

it was followed by zydus radar comment.

Jason then voting on hash and Sme then had to defend himself.

I think this will be an interesting little interaction later in the game to look back on as the flips come.

would like to hear more from @Papa Francesco and @RedDevil19

 

This feels a bit lazy. Why's your vote here?

 

Somewhat agree here and feel Sme's post was not alignment indicative, was just trying to make sure we didn't get a whole load of "actually I'm in favour of a no lynch!!" this early on.

What wording specifically, out of interest?

 

Is it? Didn't he essentially say the same thing in his first post:

 

Vote Zydus