Instantly coming in with a load of filler isn't a great look. I disagree with Sme's early suggestion of a no lynch but this is such an over the top reaction to it Could you explain what is so horrendous about suggesting a D1 no lynch? A lot more filler without saying much at all. Right now my vote would be somewhere between Zydus, Hashtag and Lugna, probably in that order of likelihood as I'm not sure scum Andy is as bold as he was with his vote here. Whereas Zydus has been a bit more subtle in casting shade on Sme which seems a more scummy thing to do on D1 than being extremely bold.
It was a suggestion of a no lynch basically at the start of the game.. it didn't sit right with me.. KNO WIT AM SAYING
Appreciate the point you're making about the ratio being the same regardless of the numbers. I don't know that the probability of lynching town / scum is the same on D1 though. There'll be more town players in the game so a higher chance you're going to hit one of those and mislynch. I also don't know how people are feeling about a '24' themed game but I'd be less inclined to believe that there are VT's or powerless roles in the game given the theme of the show. So chances are if we do mislynch a CTU player then we're going to lose somebody that is potentially useful in the night. You gave your reason and that's fine but I didn't like it. As for your final point, I'm not going to assume our aim is the same. Town and Scum aren't going to align with their plan to win the game.
lynch or no lynch is the outcome. the threat of lynch should be forcing people to the table to contribute to the game. that's my view anyway. so when I post I'm not trying to "fill" as accused by papa. I'm trying to contribute l, rather sit back and say nowt, which seems fairly easy to do day 1
Says the similar things, which I said. And then casts shade on me . Anyways, I simply put out an observation. I am satisfied with Sme's later response. I am not Hiding anything now.
of course. I'm not scum so it's wrong you'll just have believe that or not but I'll just state the truth of the matter.
Which part? The threat of lynch is only really there if people actually want a D1 lynch though. I think everyone has at least posted in this day phase but nobody is really setting off alarm bells at this point. I think that's probably reflected in seven players having a vote against them at the moment so whether people want a lynch or not, we're probably crawling towards a no lynch anyway.
Yes. I elaborated my point, but the core reasons were the same. 'Sme seeming eager for a no lynch', which to be fair to him, he later clarified upon. Didn't leave those things Covered.
FWIW my issue with your posts was probing about a potential PR and casting shade based on that, not questioning the call for a no lynch. So I don't think our posts are similar, certainly not contradictory.
You made yourself a nice shortlist mate and my answer was you are wrong cos i'm not scum. can't be more clear
Sgt your profile picture is confusing the life out of me Scunny's vote on Lugna is horrific. I like Sme's responses to his original post that I didn't like. Vote Scunny
but if i turned round and voted for you and then someone else might go oh hang on lets ramp up the pressure and see what gives? Yes we are probably crawling towards the end of the day phase with nothing much learned or to look back on when new info falls to us after each night. It is very comfortable place to be for the mafia. This is surely risk of mislynch v risk of not solving the puzzle? I have 10 suspects today. I'd like to start sorting them somehow so theres less hiding spots, that my view of it. Lets make it uncomfortable for people to slide by.
From my view, this is just filler that makes me tempted to put my vote back on you. If you want to start sorting through the other 10, put pressure on them, ask them questions, actively scum-hunt, place a vote down etc. I'm not seeing a whole lot of pro-town motivation in your posts at the moment, it has to be said.
