Hope: The Final Chapter

I thought this too, almost like he's checking if some theatre is winning anyone round.

 

@RedDevil19 are you able to tell us if scum have day chat?

 

Alright, thanks RD. There was something in this interaction that had me curious.

 

I find it hard to trust people that are happy to be lynched this early.

 

It’s to gauge how scummy I find Josh’s vote and responses to me more than anything.

If I’d made my point clear, and others completely understood it, then Josh’s vote would either be a) on him being thick or b) on him being scummy, IMO.

The fact that others don’t see my point is probably an indication that I haven’t made my point well and thus Josh’s vote is perhaps less bad.

Read it how you want. It’s a fair point from you.

 

You think I’m that obvious?

You clearly think less of me in this game than I do of myself x

 

Thanks for saying absolutely nothing.

‘It could mean anything!’ You don’t say?

What’s so interesting about those two specific posts?

 

You chose to visit a claimed PGO on the first night lil bro x

 

F*ck. I’ll give you that.

 

I'm going go be at meetings this afternoon so need to get a vote down, as Adz is ahead, and we I don't believe in no lynching, then that's my vote.

Vote: Adz

 

Yours is the first post to shout radioactive and gives certain details that might be read our of our own PMs. I

I'm still open minded if this gives you more cred as town as no scum role has flipped yet, I did like how specific it was though.

Josh's second sentence is speculation that doesn't align with the phrasing of my PM, the result WILL show up as guilty .

I read my pm as stating i will remain radiactive and i will show up as guilty to any alien investigation.

I am open minded as it can just be total speculation but i did find it interesting none the less as it opens up a possible line of defence later in the game some someone who shows up not guilty.

I have another note here from mr Baz saying it might get worse but i read that building speculation.

 

Personally if I was playing somewhere new which had a pretty small but dedicated group of players I’d be using the fact I was an outsider to a built up meta as an advantage to town.

An ability to look at the game from completely fresh eyes without a built up bias/read on every other player would be incredibly useful, and if you presented a theory which could be explained by previous play-styles then I’m sure people will point it out as and when needed.

It almost seems like you want others to bullet point each others play styles so you can go in to the game with the same biases as everyone else.

At best it’s a naive outlook on the game, at worst it’s you trying to establish a reason for knowledge a scum teammate has given you about other players.

Vote MrBaz

 

vote no lynch

one of the more fruitful d1's we've had in a while tbh, i'm happy to see where we're at by tomorrow

 

I accept some of your points, however how can it be naive if some people have tells?

 

Interesting.

I can buy the other vote, but this one seems a bit, well, a quick train like vote?

If my meeting ends before the time limit and i'm still here, this will be explored further. If not good luck guys, you'll need it if this is the game you play.

 

Don't get me wrong I don't like Burg's vote on me either but "forced" is not the kind of word I'd be using to describe the vote - the pressure he put on me felt forced yes but that's not what you're saying here, you're specifically saying the vote itself was forced when. But from his posts it's been fairly clear for a while if he was going to vote for anyone, it'd be me?

Yeah, I'm not sure why you're jumping straight to theatre here.

There's no guarantee the effect will last for the entire game. Why do you feel that what MrBaz said doesn't open up another line of defence, yet I did?