You certainly don't have the intellectual strength to answer do you? So come on, why do you need the help of FOUR others against me? Am I asking for help against you? Just stay on your own board ok.
We'll be the ones who are laughing when we are proved right and you are proved wrong superyids, DD and whoever else.
“Let the man heal” – Some Spurs fans are concerned following Mourinho’s injury update THEspursweb12:35. Ok, now I was called a dimwit and the Nigel Farage of the football forums, thank you, I've been called worse. Now, here's an article form a football website stating that Harry should heal before coming back which is what I said isn't it? No need to rush him back at all I said and I was called a dimwit by Beelz. A lot of dimwits around then and especially those who think we should rush him back regardless. IF and I say IF we are in semi finals and finals I say we should let those who obtained the finals be allowed to play in said finals.
I don't see anyone saying he should be rushed back; I see people disagreeing with your view that we are a better team without him. The earlier we can get him back into the team without rushing him and risking further injury the better in my opinion.
That's what I said, no need to rush him back at all and I'm called a dimwit. Hold on TAFKAP please for my next post.
Are Spurs Better Without Kane? - 7D News 7dnews.com/news/are-spurs-better-without-kane But according to the stats Spurs have played far better when Kane has been missing from the side this season. The England striker was out for two months after damaging his ankle in January. During his time on the side-lines Spurs won all five of their Premier League games as well as beating Borussia Dortmund 3-0 in the Champions League. Here's one of many articles from last season and as far as I can see going 5 unbeaten matches without Harry including the league champions means the same applies to this season too.
Two points to make on that really. Firstly, correlation is not the same as causation, which is to say just because we’ve had better results without him doesn’t mean that’s the reason we’ve had better results. Different opposition, a different manager, other changes in the team etc will all factor. Secondly, we’ve managed to get some good results on the back of some frankly average to poor performances. We may have had some “better results” but have we actually been better?
Points taken but, my opinion is that we have better results because he isn't playing. His absence seems somehow to free up the others, they don't feel that they have to pass to him and so they step up. There is an article about Son playing better without Harry and on his day, again my opinion, he is more effective than Kane.
Fantasy Premier League: Is Son better with or without Harry Kane? Here's another from last season and the same is happening again .
